Hello, Bartlomiej. On Thu, Feb 24, 2005 at 04:50:39PM +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote: > > + in_valid->b.status_command = 1; > > + in_valid->b.error_feature = 1; > > + in_valid->b.nsector = 1; > > ide_end_drive_cmd() must be fixed first to respect ->tf_in_flags > and it must be done *without* affecting HDIO_DRIVE_TASKFILE.
Hmmm... does it make any difference other than reading more registers? Are you worried about performance impacts? Is there hardware which acts differently if more registers are read? > > > extern int ide_driveid_update(ide_drive_t *); > > -extern int ide_ata66_check(ide_drive_t *, ide_task_t *); > > +int ide_ata66_check(ide_drive_t *, ide_task_t *); > > extern int ide_config_drive_speed(ide_drive_t *, u8); > > extern u8 eighty_ninty_three (ide_drive_t *); > > -extern int set_transfer(ide_drive_t *, ide_task_t *); > > +int set_transfer(ide_drive_t *, ide_task_t *); > > extern int taskfile_lib_get_identify(ide_drive_t *drive, u8 *); > > leftovers from previous version of the patch Yeah, sorry. Thanks. -- tejun - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/