On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 05:20:18PM +0000, Russell King wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 06:13:25PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > You call it "breakage" because you have a relatively dogmatic view
> > regarding the selection of user visible symbols.
> > Other people care more about the usability of the kernel config system,
> > and therefore a select of one of the I2C* options is quite common from
> > both outside and inside the i2c subsystem.
> >
> > There are two possbile situations:
> > - these RTC drivers are nice add-ons that could be shown if all
> > required I2C* options are already enabled
> > - these RTC drivers are pretty essential and should really be enabled
> > on the platforms they are for
> >
> > Which of these two cases describes the situation of these RTC drivers?
>
> Since RTCs aren't _actually_ essential for Linux kernel operation,
> the former clearly applies.
>
> Other people may have differing opinions, but having worked with a
> large number of SoC platforms where the RTC is reset when the SoC
> is reset, or even platforms where there is no RTC at all, it brings
> a different perspective to this that people who have only ever
> experienced systems where the RTC is always true do not have.
No problem with this.
I'm hereby withdrawing my patch.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
