No functional change. The request to allocate the irq above
NR_IRQS_LEGACY is completely pointless as the implementation enforces
that the dynamic allocations are above the GSI interrupts, which
includes the legacy PIT irqs.
This does not replace the requirement to move x86 to irq domains, but
it limits the mess to some degree.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
Cc: x...@kernel.org
---
arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c | 10 ++++------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
Index: tip/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
===================================================================
--- tip.orig/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
+++ tip/arch/x86/platform/uv/uv_irq.c
@@ -238,11 +238,9 @@ uv_set_irq_affinity(struct irq_data *dat
int uv_setup_irq(char *irq_name, int cpu, int mmr_blade,
unsigned long mmr_offset, int limit)
{
- int irq, ret;
+ int ret, irq = irq_alloc_hwirq(uv_blade_to_memory_nid(mmr_blade));
- irq = create_irq_nr(NR_IRQS_LEGACY, uv_blade_to_memory_nid(mmr_blade));
-
- if (irq <= 0)
+ if (!irq)
return -EBUSY;
ret = arch_enable_uv_irq(irq_name, irq, cpu, mmr_blade, mmr_offset,
@@ -250,7 +248,7 @@ int uv_setup_irq(char *irq_name, int cpu
if (ret == irq)
uv_set_irq_2_mmr_info(irq, mmr_offset, mmr_blade);
else
- destroy_irq(irq);
+ irq_free_hwirq(irq);
return ret;
}
@@ -285,6 +283,6 @@ void uv_teardown_irq(unsigned int irq)
n = n->rb_right;
}
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&uv_irq_lock, irqflags);
- destroy_irq(irq);
+ irq_free_hwirq(irq);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uv_teardown_irq);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
