On 7 May 2014 06:30, Nishanth Menon <n...@ti.com> wrote: > So, we could do [2] as default as well, if it is determined to impact > no one else making any form of assumptions on table ordering - but it > might be preferable for drivers not to depend on framework ordering of > data as things could change in the future.
Exactly and that's what we discussed earlier. I don't want to change the default behavior at all, as somebody may request the ascending order tomorrow :) @Jonghwan: Please consider doing this: - Don't play with the order of frequencies in table. - Instead initialize .driver_data filed with values that you need to write in the registers for all frequencies. i.e. 0 for highest frequency and FREQ_COUNT-1 for lowest one. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
