On Tuesday 06 May 2014 19:59:05 Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 04:27:10PM +0530, Shaik Ameer Basha wrote:
> > This series is going on for quite a long time and most of the patches here
> > doesn't depend on dt bindings. As Exynos IOMMU h/w is introducing new 
> > versions
> > very frequently, maintaining and reviewing all these patches again and
> > again is quite a hard job.
> > 
> > If it is acceptable, I can post one more series with the subset of
> > above patches,
> > which doesn't depend on dt-bindings. As all the patches which doesn't 
> > depend on
> > DT bindings are already tested,  I hope merging these subset of patches may 
> > help
> > in reducing the rework and review effort every time.
> > 
> > Once we finalize the generic DT bindings for the IOMMU devices, the driver
> > can be updated with the proposed DT bindings in mind.
> 
> Sounds reasonable to me if the patch subset is self-contained. When
> Arnd is OK with that and no one else has objections I can take the
> dt-independend parts.

Sounds good to me.

        Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to