On 05/02, Denys Vlasenko wrote: > > v2: More robust checks of vex.vvvv (32-bit mode safe), > simplified scratch reg selection code, > moved comments around as requested by Oleg.
OK, thanks. Given that this patch was acked by Jim, I am going to apply it. I'll try to run a couple of systemtap scripts with this patch, but unfortunately the "full" testing is simply impossible. Denys, I'll also include your test-case into the changelog. And, > static inline unsigned long * > scratch_reg(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs) > { > - return (auprobe->def.fixups & UPROBE_FIX_RIP_AX) ? ®s->ax : > ®s->cx; > + /* Order is important - more than one bit can be set! */ Really? Should I remove this comment or I misread the change in riprel_analyze? Oleg. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/