On Fri, 2 May 2014 11:08:31 +0200
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bige...@linutronix.de> wrote:
> * Steven Rostedt | 2014-04-08 22:47:02 [-0400]:
>
> >From: "Steven Rostedt (Red Hat)" <rost...@goodmis.org>
> >
> >The rt_mutex_init() macro is the same whether or not
> >CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEX is set. Remove the duplicate.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rost...@goodmis.org>
>
> This does not apply cleanly on v3.14-rt
That's because I sent this out before 3.14-rt was released :-)
>
> >--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
> >+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
> >@@ -62,25 +62,19 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper;
> > # define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
> > , .name = #mutexname, .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__
> >
> >-# define rt_mutex_init(mutex) \
> >- do { \
> >- raw_spin_lock_init(&(mutex)->wait_lock); \
> >- __rt_mutex_init(mutex, #mutex); \
> >- } while (0)
> >-
>
> The macro is the same in CONFIG_DEBUG_RT_MUTEXES and the else path.
> Shouldn't you remove both and define it before the ifdef?
That's exactly what the patch did! Except that it defined it *after* the ifdef.
Here's the patch again (as it was cut in the reply):
--- a/include/linux/rtmutex.h
+++ b/include/linux/rtmutex.h
@@ -62,25 +62,19 @@ struct hrtimer_sleeper;
# define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname) \
, .name = #mutexname, .file = __FILE__, .line = __LINE__
-# define rt_mutex_init(mutex) \
- do { \
- raw_spin_lock_init(&(mutex)->wait_lock); \
- __rt_mutex_init(mutex, #mutex); \
- } while (0)
-
extern void rt_mutex_debug_task_free(struct task_struct *tsk);
#else
# define __DEBUG_RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER(mutexname)
+# define rt_mutex_debug_task_free(t) do { } while (0)
+#endif
+
# define rt_mutex_init(mutex) \
do { \
raw_spin_lock_init(&(mutex)->wait_lock); \
__rt_mutex_init(mutex, #mutex); \
} while (0)
-# define rt_mutex_debug_task_free(t) do { } while (0)
-#endif
-
#define __RT_MUTEX_INITIALIZER_PLAIN(mutexname) \
.wait_lock = __RAW_SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(mutexname.wait_lock) \
, .wait_list = PLIST_HEAD_INIT(mutexname.wait_list) \
Take special note of the movement of the "#endif".
-- Steve
> There are some
> users of this:
> |drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c: rt_mutex_init(&adap->bus_lock);
> |drivers/media/usb/em28xx/em28xx-cards.c: rt_mutex_init(&dev->i2c_bus_lock);
>
> Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
