On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 01:04:31PM -0400, Wang, Xiaoming wrote: > loops_per_jiffy is larger than expectation that possible > causes one thread can not obtain the spin lock for a long time. > So use cpu_clock() to reach timeout in one second which can > avoid HARD LOCKUP.
This is just not making sense.. one thing is broken so then you tape on another? Fix the first already. Also, why do you care? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
