On Thu, 17 Apr 2014, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> Fair enough! I resent the patch with your Ack to Tejun.
Also note that you may want to use
this_cpu_inc
instead of raw_cpu_inc.
this_cpu_inc will not disable preemption or anything on x86 but just
create a single instruction using instruction atomicity to avoid the
preempt on/off sequence.
On platforms that cannot emit such an instruction it will fallback to
disable interrupts for the sequence of instructions that increments the
value.
With such an approach incrementing the counter should be much safer. If
the other arch want to avoid irq on/off sequences then they can override
the fallback to use atomics or whatever the processor architecture permits
to avoid the overhead of interrupt on / off.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
