On Tue, 15 Apr 2014, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> In tick_do_update_jiffies64() we are processing ticks only if delta is greater
> than tick_period. This is what we are supposed to do here and it broke a bit
> with this patch:
>
> commit 47a1b796306356f358e515149d86baf0cc6bf007
> Author: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
> Date: Thu Dec 12 13:10:55 2013 -0800
>
> tick/timekeeping: Call update_wall_time outside the jiffies lock
Please look how I massaged the change log. There is no point in
copying the whole gunk.
> With above patch, we might end up calling update_wall_time() even if delta is
> found to be smaller that tick_period. Fix this by reversing the check and
> returning early.
Well.
> Cc: <sta...@vger.kernel.org> # v3.14+
> Cc: John Stultz <john.stu...@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.ku...@linaro.org>
> ---
> kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 32 +++++++++++++++++---------------
> 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
That's not how we do bug fixes if they can be done with 3 lines of
change. See the commit.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
