> -----Original Message-----
> From: Li, Zhen-Hua [mailto:zhen-h...@hp.com]
> 
> In benet driver, netif_device_detach and netif_device_attach should be
> called between rtnl_lock and rtnl_unlock.

Zhen, it's not clear to me why rtnl_lock is needed around netif_device_attach().
Can you pls explain what exact data-structure you are protecting with the lock?

Are you see warning stack trace? I don't see ASSERT_RTNL() called anywhere from 
netif_device_attach/detach()?

thanks!

> 
> Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua <zhen-h...@hp.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c |   17 ++++++++++++++---
>  1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
> b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
> index 3e6df47..9c44b3f 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/emulex/benet/be_main.c
> @@ -4555,8 +4555,11 @@ static void be_func_recovery_task(struct work_struct 
> *work)
>               rtnl_unlock();
> 
>               status = lancer_recover_func(adapter);
> -             if (!status)
> +             if (!status) {
> +                     rtnl_lock();
>                       netif_device_attach(adapter->netdev);
> +                     rtnl_unlock();
> +             }
>       }
> 
>       /* In Lancer, for all errors other than provisioning error (-EAGAIN),
> @@ -4784,12 +4787,12 @@ static int be_suspend(struct pci_dev *pdev, 
> pm_message_t
> state)
>       be_intr_set(adapter, false);
>       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adapter->func_recovery_work);
> 
> +     rtnl_lock();
>       netif_device_detach(netdev);
>       if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> -             rtnl_lock();
>               be_close(netdev);
> -             rtnl_unlock();
>       }
> +     rtnl_unlock();
>       be_clear(adapter);
> 
>       pci_save_state(pdev);
> @@ -4804,7 +4807,9 @@ static int be_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>       struct be_adapter *adapter = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
>       struct net_device *netdev =  adapter->netdev;
> 
> +     rtnl_lock();
>       netif_device_detach(netdev);
> +     rtnl_unlock();
> 
>       status = pci_enable_device(pdev);
>       if (status)
> @@ -4832,7 +4837,9 @@ static int be_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
>       schedule_delayed_work(&adapter->func_recovery_work,
>                             msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +     rtnl_lock();
>       netif_device_attach(netdev);
> +     rtnl_unlock();
> 
>       if (adapter->wol_en)
>               be_setup_wol(adapter, false);
> @@ -4853,7 +4860,9 @@ static void be_shutdown(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adapter->work);
>       cancel_delayed_work_sync(&adapter->func_recovery_work);
> 
> +     rtnl_lock();
>       netif_device_detach(adapter->netdev);
> +     rtnl_unlock();
> 
>       be_cmd_reset_function(adapter);
> 
> @@ -4957,7 +4966,9 @@ static void be_eeh_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> 
>       schedule_delayed_work(&adapter->func_recovery_work,
>                             msecs_to_jiffies(1000));
> +     rtnl_lock();
>       netif_device_attach(netdev);
> +     rtnl_unlock();
>       return;
>  err:
>       dev_err(&adapter->pdev->dev, "EEH resume failed\n");
> --
> 1.7.10.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to