On Thu, 2005-02-17 at 20:43 +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 01:03:35AM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > I am pretty surprised myself that I was able to consolidate
> > all "page table range" functions into a single type of iterator
> > (well, there are a couple of variations, but it's not too bad).
>
> I started a similar project - but it uses the existing loops,
> just using {pte,pmd,pud,pgd}_next. The idea is to optimize
> page table walking by keeping some state in the struct page
> of the page table page that says whether an entry is set
> or not. To make this work I switched everything to indexes
> instead of pointers.
>
> Main problem are some nasty include loops.
I though about both ways yesterday, and in the end, I prefer Nick stuff,
at least for now. It gives us also more flexibility to change gory
implementation details in the future. I still have to run it through a
bit of torture testing though.
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
