On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 3:09 PM, Rob Herring <robherri...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 5:28 PM, Florian Vaussard > <florian.vauss...@epfl.ch> wrote: >> Placeholders <..> are sometimes used in the devicetree documentation >> to define family-wide compatible strings (like fsl,<chip>-ipu where >> chip can be any Freescale SoC). >> >> These placeholders are loosly defined. This lead to some >> fragmentation. Looking at the current placeholders, we have: >> >> 3 <board> >> 32 <chip> >> 1 <chip name> >> 1 <mcu-chip> >> 1 <processor> >> 30 <soc> >> 1 <SOC> >> 1 <soc-family> >> >> This patch consolidates this to: >> >> 3 <board> >> 33 <chip> >> 1 <mcu-chip> >> 1 <processor> >> 32 <soc> >> > > I would prefer to consolidate these into just board and chip. If we > have any oddballs, they can just document the exact strings.
Florian, Do you plan to re-spin this? I can take it for 3.15 if it is early in the rc's. Rob -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
