Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


I have attached a patch to add realtime support for PowerPC (32 bit
only). [...]


two comments:

- why is us_to_tb needed? It just seems to add alot of unnecessary
  clutter to the patch, while it's not used anywhere.

Sorry, the usage of us_to_tb got dropped from the patch when I moved it from one of my development trees to another. It gets used in usecs_to_cycles(). The patch to add that is attached below.

Even with the usage of us_to_tb by usecs_to_cycles(), there is a lot
of added clutter for what is accomplished.  I considered a nasty hack
to try to derive the proper value from other sources, but adding
us_to_tb seemed a lot easier to understand.

This patch also adds the dreaded #ifdefs, so I suspect it will not be
the correct implementation long term.  I'm not sure if Manish's patch
included the ARM implementation of usecs_to_cycles() - it is a third
case in the #ifdef.

Performance instrumentation is also going to need mcount() and
_mcount(), which is currently a work in progress.


- could you submit the drivers/net/ibm_emac/ibm_emac_core.c patch upstream as well?

Yes, I will do that.



otherwise it looks pretty clean and straightforward.

Ingo


Source: MontaVista Software, Inc.
Signed-off-by: Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Index: linux-2.6.10/kernel/latency.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.10.orig/kernel/latency.c
+++ linux-2.6.10/kernel/latency.c
@@ -192,7 +192,11 @@ static unsigned long notrace cycles_to_u

 static cycles_t notrace usecs_to_cycles(unsigned long delta)
 {
+#if defined CONFIG_X86
        return (cycles_t) delta * (cycles_t) (cpu_khz/1000+1);
+#elif defined(CONFIG_PPC)
+       return delta * us_to_tb;
+#endif
 }

 #ifdef CONFIG_LATENCY_TRACE



Thanks,

-Frank (off to vacation for a couple days)
--
Frank Rowand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MontaVista Software, Inc

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to