* Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > See net/core/dev.c:softnet_data
>
> How about a design to put softirq's into domains. [...]
just to make sure that the context of this discussion is not lost to
David and other readers of lkml. We are not redesigning softirqs in any
way, shape or form for the normal kernel - there they remain what they
are.
This discussion is about seemless (automatic) extensions/modifications
to the softirq concept on PREEMPT_RT, for latency reduction purposes.
PREEMPT_SOFTIRQS is already such an extension.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
