On Wed, Apr 09, 2014 at 02:57:19PM -0400, Jason Baron wrote:
> Right, so maybe the fact that its a desktop chipset means that it
> behaves differently and doesn't raise MCEs on memory errors. We have a
> bunch of these processors and we haven't yet seen an MCE raised on a
> memory error.
This can't be - an uncorrectable error will have to generate a machine
check exception if consumed - there's no other option.
Can you do
rdmsr 0x179
rdmsr 0x17b
and paste the results here?
> The reason I went with ie31200 is that afaiu the memory controller hub
> is integrated into the cpu. Another alternative might be ie312xx?
Yeah, if Tony doesn't come up with something more official about that
MCH.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
