on den 16.02.2005 Klokka 17:17 (+0100) skreiv Andreas Gruenbacher: > On Tue, 2005-02-15 at 18:29, Trond Myklebust wrote: > > lau den 22.01.2005 Klokka 21:34 (+0100) skreiv Andreas Gruenbacher: > > > Solaris nfsacl workaround > > > > NACK. No hacks. > > Well, I'm not in the position to fix Solaris. It would be possible to > implement NFSACL for NFSv2 (Solaris has it), but I doubt that we need > it. Your NACK probably means we'll have to carry it around as a vendor > patch.
See the thread between Olivier Galibert & I. There are ways of doing this which do not involve putting nfsacl code in the generic sunrpc layer. Either a callback or a flag in the "struct svc_program" to override the standard RPC server reply (instead of checking the ACL program number) would be fine as far as I'm concerned. I can't speak for Neil's preferences, though. I am, however, surprised when you say that Solaris has problems with this. The PROG_MISMATCH error does also tell the client the minimum and maximum supported version, so if all is working well, then it recognize that we support version 3 only. It seems wierd that they should then choose to treat that as an mount failure. Cheers, Trond -- Trond Myklebust <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
