> Anyway, I think there will don't have any necessary to upstream > ktap any more, I still enjoy the simplicity and flexibility given
Not sure how you got to that conclusion. You were asked to evaluate if EBPF is an alternative for ktap. It looks like the answer is no. So the original KTAP VM design is back on the table. You can continue pursuing to merge that. No reason to give up. BTW I agree that EBPF won't work for ktap. The models (static vs dynamic typing etc.) are just too different. But it's good that it was studied in detail. -Andi -- a...@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
