Am Dienstag, den 15.02.2005, 09:43 -0500 schrieb Dmitry Torokhov:
> On Tue, 15 Feb 2005 14:43:08 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 15, 2005 at 09:57:59AM +0100, Kenan Esau wrote:
> > > +static struct dmi_system_id lifebook_dmi_table[] = {
> > > + {
> > > + .ident = "Fujitsu Siemens Lifebook B-Sereis",
> > > + .matches = {
> > > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_PRODUCT_NAME, "LIFEBOOK B Series"),
> > > + },
> > > + },
> > > + { }
> > > +};
> >
> > This might be a bit too much generic. Are you sure there are no B Series
> > lifebooks without a touchscreen?
> >
>
> And another concern: does this notebook (or others using this
> touchscreen) have an active MUX? We don't want to force LBTOUCH
> protocol on an external mouse.
All B-Series Lifebooks have the same touchscreen-hardware. But Dmitri's
concern is correct -- at the moment I would enforce the LBTOUCH-protocol
on external mice...
I have to fix this. I will additionally to the DMI stuff use "Status
Request". On a "Request ID"-Command the Device always answers with a
0x00 -- could this also be helpfull?
> > > +static psmouse_ret_t lifebook_process_byte(struct psmouse *psmouse,
> > > struct pt_regs *regs)
> > > +{
> > > + unsigned char *packet = psmouse->packet;
> > > + struct input_dev *dev = &psmouse->dev;
> > > +
> > > + unsigned long x = 0;
> > > + unsigned long y = 0;
> > > + static uint8_t pkt_lst_touch = 0;
> > > + static uint8_t pkt_cur_touch = 0;
> > > + uint8_t pkt_lb = packet[0] & LBTOUCH_LB;
> > > + uint8_t pkt_rb = packet[0] & LBTOUCH_RB;
>
> We usually don't use userspace types here. unsigned char or u8 for kernel.
>
> > > +
> > > + psmouse->protocol_handler = lifebook_process_byte;
> > > + psmouse->disconnect = lifebook_disconnect;
> > > + psmouse->reconnect = lifebook_initialize;
> > > + psmouse->initialize = lifebook_initialize;
> > > + psmouse->pktsize = 3;
> > > + }
> > > +
> > > + return 0;
> > > +}
> >
> > The change to the psmouse interface I'm leaving to Dmitry to comment on.
>
> I don't think that we need a separate initialize handler simply
> because it is called just once, at initialization time. Here we know
> exactly what device (protocol) we are dealing with, no need for
> indirection.
I introduced the new initialize-handler since psmouse->initialize() is
also used in psmouse-base.c. This is to prevent putting if-statements on
each place where the initialization-function for a certain protocol is
called in psmouse-base.c.
I admit since I am also using a different reconnect-function than
psmouse-base it's not such a huge benefit but think of a new
protocol/device which uses the same reconnect-function as psmouse-base
but a different init-function.
My goal was to have no dependency from psmouse-base to the
lifebook-handling (none but lifebook_detect()). Thus the indirection is
IMHO needed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
