3.13-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>

commit b37199e626b31e1175fb06764c5d1d687723aac2 upstream.

We can get false negative from __lookup_mnt() if an unrelated vfsmount
gets moved.  In that case legitimize_mnt() is guaranteed to fail,
and we will fall back to non-RCU walk... unless we end up running
into a hard error on a filesystem object we wouldn't have reached
if not for that false negative.  IOW, delaying that check until
the end of pathname resolution is wrong - we should recheck right
after we attempt to cross the mountpoint.  We don't need to recheck
unless we see d_mountpoint() being true - in that case even if
we have just raced with mount/umount, we can simply go on as if
we'd come at the moment when the sucker wasn't a mountpoint; if we
run into a hard error as the result, it was a legitimate outcome.
__lookup_mnt() returning NULL is different in that respect, since
it might've happened due to operation on completely unrelated
mountpoint.

Signed-off-by: Al Viro <v...@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 fs/namei.c |   29 +++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/namei.c
+++ b/fs/namei.c
@@ -1098,7 +1098,7 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct na
                        return false;
 
                if (!d_mountpoint(path->dentry))
-                       break;
+                       return true;
 
                mounted = __lookup_mnt(path->mnt, path->dentry);
                if (!mounted)
@@ -1114,20 +1114,7 @@ static bool __follow_mount_rcu(struct na
                 */
                *inode = path->dentry->d_inode;
        }
-       return true;
-}
-
-static void follow_mount_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
-{
-       while (d_mountpoint(nd->path.dentry)) {
-               struct mount *mounted;
-               mounted = __lookup_mnt(nd->path.mnt, nd->path.dentry);
-               if (!mounted)
-                       break;
-               nd->path.mnt = &mounted->mnt;
-               nd->path.dentry = mounted->mnt.mnt_root;
-               nd->seq = read_seqcount_begin(&nd->path.dentry->d_seq);
-       }
+       return read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq);
 }
 
 static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct nameidata *nd)
@@ -1155,7 +1142,17 @@ static int follow_dotdot_rcu(struct name
                        break;
                nd->seq = read_seqcount_begin(&nd->path.dentry->d_seq);
        }
-       follow_mount_rcu(nd);
+       while (d_mountpoint(nd->path.dentry)) {
+               struct mount *mounted;
+               mounted = __lookup_mnt(nd->path.mnt, nd->path.dentry);
+               if (!mounted)
+                       break;
+               nd->path.mnt = &mounted->mnt;
+               nd->path.dentry = mounted->mnt.mnt_root;
+               nd->seq = read_seqcount_begin(&nd->path.dentry->d_seq);
+               if (!read_seqretry(&mount_lock, nd->m_seq))
+                       goto failed;
+       }
        nd->inode = nd->path.dentry->d_inode;
        return 0;
 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to