On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 06:23:26PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > On Sun, 2014-03-30 at 02:29 +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote: > > These days in the kernel we treat checkpatch.pl and GCC > > warnings the same so it sucks when they are something conditional. > > Treating checkpatch messages like gcc compilation warnings > and failures has got to change. > > There is _no way_ checkpatch can have no false positives. >
We could argue back and forth, but for now lets just revert the ether_addr_copy() check because people ignore the alignement requirement and it just encourages people to introduce bugs. regards, dan carpenter -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
