On Sat, Feb 12, 2005 at 09:30:54AM +0100, Harald Dunkel wrote: > Greg KH wrote: > > > >Because we don't have an easy way yet to build against a copy of klibc > >on a system? For right now, it's the simplest way to ensure that it > >works for everyone, once klibc moves into the kernel tree I can remove > >it from udev and hotplug-ng. > > > > If it is not possible to use klibc together with a non-Linux > system (e.g. FreeBSD or Mach), then I would suggest to make > klibc an optional kernel patch and drop it from udev and > hotplug.
But it is not possible to use udev or hotplug-ng on a non-Linux system, right? As far as "optional kernel patch"? What do you mean? People are working on adding klibc to the main kernel tree, nothing optional about that. > >Is it causing problems for you? > > > > Some months ago I had contributed a patch to add an install > target to the klibc Makefiles. I just wonder why it has been > ignored. Don't know, I'm not in charge of klibc development. Why not ask on the klibc mailing list? thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
