During pcpu_alloc_area(), we might merge the current head with the
previous block. Since we have calculated the max_contig using the
size of previous block before we skip it, and now we update the size
of previous block, so we should renew the max_contig.

Signed-off-by: Jianyu Zhan <nasa4...@gmail.com>
---
 mm/percpu.c | 6 ++++--
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/percpu.c b/mm/percpu.c
index 036cfe0..cfda29c 100644
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@ -506,9 +506,11 @@ static int pcpu_alloc_area(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, int 
size, int align)
                 * uncommon for percpu allocations.
                 */
                if (head && (head < sizeof(int) || chunk->map[i - 1] > 0)) {
-                       if (chunk->map[i - 1] > 0)
+                       if (chunk->map[i - 1] > 0) {
                                chunk->map[i - 1] += head;
-                       else {
+                               max_contig =
+                                       max(chunk->map[i - 1], max_contig);
+                       } else {
                                chunk->map[i - 1] -= head;
                                chunk->free_size -= head;
                        }
-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to