On Sun, Feb 13, 2005 at 09:22:46AM +0100, Vojtech Pavlik wrote:
> And I suppose it was running just fine without the patch as well?
Correct.
> The question was whether the patch helps, or whether it is not needed.
If you look again at the patch I posted, it only borrowed a few lines
of the patch from Dmitry that started this thread; I eliminated Alan's
recent udelay(50) addition, reduced the loop delay, and added debug
printks to the *_wait routines to determine whether the loop is ever taken.
At least so far, those debugging statements have produced no output.
I'll use the machine a bit and report back if I trigger anything.
Regards,
Bill Rugolsky
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
