On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Joe Perches wrote:
> But using "if (0)" prevents the no_printk from occurring at all so there
> would be no side-effects and the format & args would still be verified
> by the compiler.
I'd prefer this (for symmetry and clarity):
#if NDEBUG
#define dprintk(flg, fmt, ...) \
do { if ((NDEBUG) & (flg)) pr_debug(fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
#else
#define dprintk(flg, fmt, ...) \
do { if (0) pr_debug(fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
#endif
But you seem to be asking for this instead:
#if NDEBUG
#define dprintk(flg, fmt, ...) \
do { if ((NDEBUG) & (flg)) pr_debug(fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
#else
#define dprintk(flg, fmt, ...) \
do { if (0) no_printk(fmt, ## __VA_ARGS__); } while (0)
#endif
Why is that better?
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
