* George Anzinger <george@mvista.com> wrote:
> Possibly from:
> define __raw_spin_is_locked(x) (*(volatile signed char *)(&(x)->lock)
> <= 0)
> #define __raw_spin_unlock_wait(x) \
> do { barrier(); } while(__spin_is_locked(x))
> in asm/spinlock.h
>
> should that be __raw_spin_is_locked(x) instead?
yeah. Is this in the ARM patch? I havent applied the ARM patch yet,
waiting to see Thomas Gleixner's generic-hardirq based one. (which is
more compelling from an architectural and long-term maintainance POV -
but also more work to address all of RMK's concerns.)
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
