On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 6:51 AM, Sander Eikelenboom
<li...@eikelenboom.it> wrote:
>
>
> Ok but the breakage/regression was known since around the merge window.
> I thought the "standard policy" when things cause new regression and are not
> fixable (too intrusive, too time consuming you
> name the reason), was to revert ..
It is indeed.
Guys, why is this being discussed? We should not release a
known-broken 3.14 just because the fix is too big for rc. Things
should be reverted.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
