On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 12:31 AM, Alexander Gordeev <agord...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2014 at 11:34:21PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> I mean the below block can be put inside the previous lock: > > Oh, *now* I see what you mean. Please, ignore my prevous reply. > Still, we want to release the lock as soon as possible and > there is no reason to the below bits it under lock.
Actually my comment was wrong because pool->cpus_have_tags should be guarded by pool->lock instead of the percpu tag->lock. Sorry for the noise. Thanks, -- Ming Lei -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
