>-----Original Message----- >From: Peter Zijlstra [mailto:pet...@infradead.org] >Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2014 5:11 PM >To: Tony Lu >Cc: Paul Mackerras; Ingo Molnar; Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo; Chris Metcalf; >linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] tile: Add support for handling PMC hardware > >On Thu, Mar 06, 2014 at 06:13:48AM +0000, Tony Lu wrote: > >The changelogs are all very sparse. But in general the stuff looks to >have the right shape. > >It looks like you do software NMIs with interrupt priority levels; which >is a perfectly fine way, other archs do the same. > >One thing I didn't spot is a tile irq_work implementation; perf likes to >have one.
We do not have tile irq_work for now. It seems like perf works fine even without the arch irq_work. Anyway, we will investigate it, and submit it as a separate patch when it gets ready. Thanks -Tony -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
