Hello, all. I am really sorry for the silence - I was on the business trip and returned today.
I will recheck everything and try. Meanwhile, the news are not good: our guys say that it appears that the additional sync DOES NOT SOLVE the issue. I ask for excuse, but as I did not know the exact processing, I was mistaken and, probably, used already gc-ted unit for tests. Sorry, again. BR On Tuesday 04 March 2014 00:33:25 Brian Norris wrote: > On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:13:36PM -0600, Andrew Ruder wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 01:22:08PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote: > > > Perhaps Richard or Andrew can comment on whether this patch should > > > help you. But I think JFFS2 on NAND uses write-buffered support > > > which can be affected by this bug. > > > > Definitely sounds like the same issue and I'm kind of glad to see it > > crop up in another filesystem. > > We haven't confirmed that the *patch* actually affects Leon's problem; > just that if he runs an additional 'sync' it solves his problem. > Leon, did you get to try the patch? > > Anyway, should commit 807612db2f9940b9fa6deaef054eb16d51bd3e00 be > marked for -stable? > > Brian -- Leon -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
