On Mon, Mar 03, 2014 at 03:07:29PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote: > On 2014/3/1 10:40, David E. Box wrote: > > From: "David E. Box" <david.e....@linux.intel.com> > > > > Make the IOSF Mailbox driver built in as it provides core functionality > > needed > > for new Intel SOC platforms to access the device registers on the SOC. > > > > Signed-off-by: David E. Box <david.e....@linux.intel.com> > > --- > > arch/x86/Kconfig | 7 ++----- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/arch/x86/Kconfig b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > index d3b1f8b..e34b252 100644 > > --- a/arch/x86/Kconfig > > +++ b/arch/x86/Kconfig > > @@ -2385,12 +2385,9 @@ config X86_DMA_REMAP > > depends on STA2X11 > > > > config IOSF_MBI > > - bool > > + bool "Intel IOSF Mailbox Driver support" > > One concern here is, IOSF is not architectural for all of X86, can we > change this as "Intel Atom IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? Or if you can > confirm we'll use IOSF in the future onchip product, can we change this > as "Intel SOC IOSF Mailbox Driver support"? >
Ok. The latter would be more appropriate. david box -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
