On 02/28/2014 07:13 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 05:28:24AM +0000, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
On Fri, 2014-02-21 at 17:22 +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
The asm-generic rwsem implementation directly acceses sem->cnt when
performing a __down_read_trylock operation. Whilst this is probably safe
on all architectures, we should stick to the atomic_long_* API and use
atomic_long_read instead.

Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will.dea...@arm.com>
---
  include/asm-generic/rwsem.h | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index bb1e2cdeb9bf..75af612f54f8 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore 
*sem)
  {
        long tmp;

-       while ((tmp = sem->count) >= 0) {
+       while ((tmp = atomic_long_read((atomic_long_t *)&sem->count)) >= 0) {

That's pretty ugly, how about having infinite look and just do the tmp
assign separately from the conditional?

It also looks like a cpu_relax() could help here between iterations.

This is the read trylock so no cpu_relax().

Other than that:

Reviewed-by: Davidlohr Bueso <davidl...@hp.com>

Actually, we should make that cmpxchg an atomic_long_cmpxchg, so the extra
diff ends up looking like below. It's ugly adding a cpu_relax(), since you
only want it when the cmpxchg fails (and we don't have such logic in the
asm-generic __atomic_add_unless, for example).

Will

--->8

diff --git a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
index 603a0a11e592..2b6401f9e428 100644
--- a/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
+++ b/include/asm-generic/rwsem.h
@@ -40,14 +40,16 @@ static inline void __down_read(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
  static inline int __down_read_trylock(struct rw_semaphore *sem)
  {
         long tmp;
+       atomic_long_t *cnt = (atomic_long_t *)&sem->count;

The shared rwsem failure paths (kernel/locking/rwsem_xadd.c) peek at
sem->count as long type, so this isn't really necessary.


-       while ((tmp = atomic_long_read((atomic_long_t *)&sem->count)) >= 0) {
-               if (tmp == cmpxchg(&sem->count, tmp,
-                                  tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS)) {
-                       return 1;
-               }
-       }
-       return 0;
+       do {
+               tmp = atomic_long_read(cnt);
+               if (tmp < 0)
+                       return 0;
+       } while (tmp != atomic_long_cmpxchg(cnt, tmp,
+                                           tmp + RWSEM_ACTIVE_READ_BIAS));
+
+       return 1;
  }

Regards,
Peter Hurley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to