From: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>

Clarify in the documentation that perf mem report reports
use-latency, not load/store-latency on Intel systems.
This often causes confusion with users.

Cc: eran...@google.com
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <a...@linux.intel.com>
---
 tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt | 4 ++++
 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt 
b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
index 888d511..1d78a40 100644
--- a/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
+++ b/tools/perf/Documentation/perf-mem.txt
@@ -18,6 +18,10 @@ from it, into perf.data. Perf record options are accepted 
and are passed through
 "perf mem -t <TYPE> report" displays the result. It invokes perf report with 
the
 right set of options to display a memory access profile.
 
+Note that on Intel systems the memory latency reported is the use-latency,
+not the pure load (or store latency). Use latency includes any pipeline
+queueing delays in addition to the memory subsystem latency.
+
 OPTIONS
 -------
 <command>...::
-- 
1.8.5.3

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to