Hi,
From: YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [EMAIL PROTECTED](B <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 31 Jan 2005 14:16:36 +0900 (JST)
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 31 Jan 2005 06:00:40 +0100), Patrick
> McHardy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> |We don't need this for IPv6 yet. Once we get nf_conntrack in we
> |might need this, but its IPv6 fragment handling is different from
> |ip_conntrack, I need to check first.
>
> Ok. It would be better to have some comment but anyway...
> kozakai-san?
IMO, fix for nf_conntrack isn't needed yet. Because someone may change
IPv6 fragment handling in nf_conntrack.
Anyway, current nf_conntrack passes the original (not de-fragmented) skb to
IPv6 stack. nf_conntrack doesn't touch its dst.
Regards,
----------------------------------------
Yasuyuki KOZAKAI
Communication Platform Laboratory,
Corporate Research & Development Center,
Toshiba Corporation
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
----------------------------------------
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
