On 02/24/2014 07:33 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
On Fri, 2014-14-02 at 22:02:12 UTC, Cody P Schafer wrote:
This provides a basic link between perf and hv_gpci. Notably, it does
not yet support transactions and does not list any events (they can
still be manually composed).
Can you explain how the HV_CAPS stuff ends up looking.
I'm not against adding it, but I'd like to understand how we expect it to be
used a bit better.
It's just a quick mechanism for me to expose some relevant information
to userspace via sysfs using the hv_perf_caps_get() function's returned
data. Documentation for this sysfs interface (and the rest) is in a
later patch.
I don't expect any more uses to show up unless the firmware decides to
add another capability bit (in which case I'll want to expose it as well).
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..1f5d96d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/hv-gpci.c
+
+static struct pmu h_gpci_pmu = {
+ .task_ctx_nr = perf_invalid_context,
+
+ .name = "hv_gpci",
+ .attr_groups = attr_groups,
+ .event_init = h_gpci_event_init,
+ .add = h_gpci_event_add,
+ .del = h_gpci_event_del,
= h_gpci_event_stop,
+ .start = h_gpci_event_start,
+ .stop = h_gpci_event_stop,
+ .read = h_gpci_event_read,
= h_gpci_event_update
+ .event_idx = perf_swevent_event_idx,
+};
whoops, thought I had fixed those 2 already.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
