On Monday 24 February 2014 13:16:05 One Thousand Gnomes wrote:
>
> While I agree defining it as do {} while(1); would be a lot smarter,
> simply making it required that a platform provides an implementation of
> BUG() would be even better.
But how do we get there? The majority of architectures define BUG()
already, but a lot of them only if CONFIG_BUG is enabled. That is
of course trivial do change, and it is what my older patch does
for ARM and x86.
We also have seven architectures without a BUG() implementation (c6x,
m32r, meta, microblaze, score, sh, unicore32) and six more (arm64,
hexagon openrisc tile um xtensa) that have no bug.h at all.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
