On Sat, Feb 22, 2014 at 2:08 AM, Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de> wrote: > > As I said before irq_reserve_irq() is a misnomer and a > misconception. Of course this needs to be fixed as well. > > And you cannot just blindly change it because !SPARSE can use the > allocation. We are not creating stupid corner cases just to support > your sloppyness. Its not rocket science to do it the right way. > > That said, it might be worthwhile to get rid of the !SPARSE case > completely. That would probably make quite some stuff simpler.
So we need to make all arches support SPARSE_IRQ at first? Now we have arm, arm64, c6x, metag, powerpc, sh, x86 support SPARSE_IRQ. The following are not with SPARSE_IRQ yet: alpha, arc, avr32, blackfin, cris, frv, hexagon, m32r, m68k, microblaze, mips, mn10300, openrisc, parisc, s390, score, sparc, tile, um, unicore32, xtensa. Thanks Yinghai Thanks Yinghai -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
