* Jiri Olsa <jo...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 06:59:36PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> > Em Wed, Feb 19, 2014 at 04:52:54PM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu:
> > > Currently the we display all detected features/libraries
> > > by following rules:
> > > - if one of the features is missing
> > > - if it's build from clean tree
> > >
> > > This patch changes changes this behavior in several ways.
> > >
> > > - We no longer display all detected features, only detected
> > > libraries are displayed by default:
> > >
> > > $ make
> > > BUILD: Doing 'make -j4' parallel build
> > >
> > > Auto-detecting system features:
> > > ... dwarf: [ on ]
> > > ... glibc: [ on ]
> > > ... gtk2: [ on ]
> > > ... libaudit: [ on ]
> > > ... libbfd: [ on ]
> > > ... libelf: [ on ]
> > > ... libnuma: [ on ]
> > > ... libperl: [ on ]
> > > ... libpython: [ on ]
> > > ... libslang: [ on ]
> > > ... libunwind: [ on ]
> >
> > I like it, testing now, one suggestion: Since this is just about
> > libraries, ditch the "lib' prefix, and make the header more
> > informative, making it look like this:
> >
> > Auto-detecting system libraries that enables features:
> > ... dwarf: [ on ]
> > ... c: [ on ]
> > ... gtk2: [ on ]
> > ... audit: [ on ]
> > ... bfd: [ on ]
> > ... elf: [ on ]
> > ... numa: [ on ]
> > ... perl: [ on ]
> > ... python: [ on ]
> > ... slang: [ on ]
> > ... unwind: [ on ]
>
> yep, we could prettify it somehow.. but those names are tightly
> bound to tests in config/feature-checks/Makefile .. so it'd
> mean bigger change ;-)
The naming is also generally related to the feature test and the
component library being tested, so it could be misleading/confusing to
strip it?
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
