On Thu, Feb 20, 2014 at 11:52:03AM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > > From: Anton Vorontsov <an...@enomsg.org> > > > > There is nothing hrtimer-specific inside the timerfd_tmrproc(), except > > the function prototype. We're about to add other timer types, so factor > > out generic timerfd_expire() helper from timerfd_tmrproc(). > > This changelog is completely useless. How is timerfd_tmrproc, which is > not a function but a function pointer, related to the patch? > > Moving duplicated code to a common function is nice, but ....
> > Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.voront...@linaro.org> > > Signed-off-by: Alexey Perevalov <a.pereva...@samsung.com> ... > Warnings are there to be ignored and testing of user space > interfaces after a change is overrated, right? > > Aside of that you just blindly copied the original code w/o fixing up > the now unnecessary line breaks. Alexey, While I appreciate the desire to be careful with authorship and stuff, please remove my name as an author of this patch -- the current code has nothing to do with my original work, and I surely don't want to take any responsibility for it. This is a common practice if you modify someone's patch to a great extend. Thomas is bashing the thing, which has my name on it; although _my_ patch did not produce any warnings, came with a completely different changelog, and served completely different purposes. Instead of rushing with resending yet another series, please actually read Thomas' review. Thanks, Anton -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
