On Tue, 18 Feb 2014 17:06:06 -0500 Dave Jones <da...@redhat.com> wrote:

> /proc/self/make-it-fail is a boolean, but accepts any number, including
> negative ones. Change variable to unsigned, and cap upper bound at 1.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Jones <da...@fedoraproject.org>
> 
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index 51507065263b..b926377c354f 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_read(struct file * 
> file, char __user * buf,
>       struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
>       char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
>       size_t len;
> -     int make_it_fail;
> +     unsigned int make_it_fail;
>  
>       if (!task)
>               return -ESRCH;
> @@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_write(struct file * 
> file,
>  {
>       struct task_struct *task;
>       char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF], *end;
> -     int make_it_fail;
> +     unsigned int make_it_fail;
>  
>       if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
>               return -EPERM;
> @@ -1236,6 +1236,9 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_write(struct file * 
> file,
>       make_it_fail = simple_strtol(strstrip(buffer), &end, 0);
>       if (*end)
>               return -EINVAL;
> +     if (make_it_fail > 1)
> +             return -EINVAL;
> +
>       task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
>       if (!task)
>               return -ESRCH;

Switching `make_it_fail' to unsigned makes the test simpler but it does
rather muck up the typing in there.  task_struct.make_it_fail is still
an int, we should now use simple_strtoul rather than simple_strtol,
proc_fault_inject_read()'s snprintf() should now use %u, etc.  None of
which actually matters, but still...

Rather than address all that I'm inclined to leave `make_it_fail' as an
int, turning your patch into a one-liner?

--- 
a/fs/proc/base.c~fault-injection-set-bounds-on-what-proc-self-make-it-fail-accepts-fix
+++ a/fs/proc/base.c
@@ -1207,7 +1207,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_read(st
        struct task_struct *task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
        char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF];
        size_t len;
-       unsigned int make_it_fail;
+       int make_it_fail;
 
        if (!task)
                return -ESRCH;
@@ -1224,7 +1224,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_write(s
 {
        struct task_struct *task;
        char buffer[PROC_NUMBUF], *end;
-       unsigned int make_it_fail;
+       int make_it_fail;
 
        if (!capable(CAP_SYS_RESOURCE))
                return -EPERM;
@@ -1236,7 +1236,7 @@ static ssize_t proc_fault_inject_write(s
        make_it_fail = simple_strtol(strstrip(buffer), &end, 0);
        if (*end)
                return -EINVAL;
-       if (make_it_fail > 1)
+       if (make_it_fail < 0 || make_it_fail > 1)
                return -EINVAL;
 
        task = get_proc_task(file_inode(file));
_

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to