On 01/23/14 22:16, Charles Keepax wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 04:22:22PM -0500, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
Despite the name mach-crag6410-module.c, the code is built for
MACH_WLF_CRAGG_6410 -- which is bool, and hence this code is
either present or absent. It will never be modular, so using
module_init as an alias for __initcall can be somewhat
misleading.
Fix this up now, so that we can relocate module_init from
init.h into module.h in the future. If we don't do this, we'd
have to add module.h to obviously non-modular code, and that
would be a worse thing.
Note that direct use of __initcall is discouraged, vs. one
of the priority categorized subgroups. As __initcall gets
mapped onto device_initcall, our use of device_initcall
directly in this change means that the runtime impact is
zero -- it will remain at level 6 in initcall ordering.
Cc: Ben Dooks<ben-li...@fluff.org>
Cc: Kukjin Kim<kgene....@samsung.com>
Cc: Russell King<li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
Cc: patc...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker<paul.gortma...@windriver.com>
---
Tested-by: Charles Keepax<ckee...@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Thanks, applied.
- Kukjin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
