On 13.02.2014 21:29, Will Deacon wrote:

Can you try hacking crypto/memneq.c so that it doesn't use
CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS please? That would at least point the
finger at net/mac80211/rx.c or similar.

Cheers,

Will


Well, I am lazy so I hacked net/mac80211/rx.c first:

index c24ca0d..6839c77 100644
--- a/net/mac80211/rx.c
+++ b/net/mac80211/rx.c
@@ -1963,7 +1963,7 @@ ieee80211_deliver_skb(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
                }
        }

-#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
+//#ifndef CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
        if (skb) {
                /* 'align' will only take the values 0 or 2 here since all
                 * frames are required to be aligned to 2-byte boundaries
@@ -1987,7 +1987,7 @@ ieee80211_deliver_skb(struct ieee80211_rx_data *rx)
                        }
                }
        }
-#endif
+//#endif

        if (skb) {
                /* deliver to local stack */


and that seems to fix the problem.

I am not sure whom I should forward the problem.

Thanks,
Ivo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to