> > > > Use the device platform data as a regmap config > > > > name. This is particularly useful in the regmap > > > > debugfs when there is more than one syscon device > > > > registered, to distinguish the register blocks. > > > > > > > > Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> > > > > Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jo...@linaro.org> > > > > Signed-off-by: Pawel Moll <pawel.m...@arm.com> > > > > --- > > > ... > > > > syscon_regmap_config.max_register = res->end - res->start - 3; > > > > + syscon_regmap_config.name = dev_get_platdata(&pdev->dev); > > > > > > Is dev_name(&pdev->dev) can be used for such purpose? > > > > Yes of course. > > > > Either use the automatically generated name or over-ride with > > dev->init_name prior to registration or call dev_set_name() > > manually. Then retrieve with Alexander's suggestion. > > > > Is there any technical reason why this is not possible with your > > implementation? > > Hold on, guys. Let me just point out that we're talking "non-DT" > platform devices here (either statically defined struct > platform_device-s or - my case - the MFD cells). > > In this case device/driver matching relies completely on device name. > Either the pdev->name must be identical (strcmp) to pdrv->name, or the > pdev->name must be identical (strcmp again) to one of the pdev->id_table > entries. See platform_match() in driver/base/platform.c for more > details. > > Therefore the dev_name(&pdev->dev) on a non-DT-originating sysconf > devince will always return "sysconf.*", unless you're ready to maintain > a growing syscon_ids[] list. If so, I will have to add three entries > there ("sys_id", "sys_misc" and "sys_procid"). I hope you are not > seriously considering this idea :-) After all that's what the > platform_data was invented for.
Ah, I see your predicament. I guess that is a limitation of the was syscon works. Usually we'd use match tables to differentiate between various supported devices, but I guess the 'supported devices' list for syscon is pretty limitless. In which case I support your second implementation (adding a platform_data container) for the use of arbitrary/useful-common names. -- Lee Jones Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/