>It's clever that they do that, but additional control is needed in the >future. jackd isn't the most sophisticate media app on this planet (not >too much of an insult :)) and the demands from this group is bound to
Actually, JACK probably is the most sophisticated media *framework* on the planet, at least inasmuch as it connects ideas drawn from the media world and OS research/design into a coherent package. Its not perfect, and we've just started adding new data types to its capabilities (its actually relatively easy). But it is amazingly powerful in comparison to anything offered to data, and is unencumbered by the limitations that have affected other attempts to do what it does. And it makes possible some of the most sophisticated *audio* apps on the planet, though admittedly not video and other data at this time. >increase as their group and competing projects get more and more >sophisticated. When I mean kernel folks needs to be proactive, I really >mean it. The Linux kernel latency issues and poor driver support is >largely why media apps are way below even being second rate with regard >to other operating systems such as Apple's OS X for instance. This is a bit misleading. With the right kernel+patch, Linux performs at least as well as OSX, and measurably better in many configurations and cases. And its JACK that has provided OSX with inter-application audio routing, not the other way around. The higher quality of OSX apps isn't because of kernel latency or poor driver support: its because the apps have been under development for longer and have the immense of benefit of OSX's single unified development environment. Within the next month, expect to see several important Linux audio apps released for OSX, providing functionality not available on that platform at present. --p - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/