On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 12:28:55PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> With the introduction of NUMA systems, came the possibility of remote memory 
> accesses.
> Combine those remote memory accesses with contention on the remote node (ie a 
> modified
> cacheline) and you have a possibility for very long latencies.  These 
> latencies can
> bottleneck a program.
> 
> The program added by these patches, helps detect the situation where two 
> nodes are
> 'tugging' on the same _data_ cacheline.  The term used through out this 
> program and
> the various changelogs is called a HITM.  This means nodeX went to read a 
> cacheline
> and it was discovered to be loaded in nodeY's LLC cache (hence the cacheHIT). 
> The 
> remote cacheline was also in a 'M'odified state thus creating a 'HIT M' for 
> hit in
> a modified state.  HITMs can happen locally and remotely.  This program's 
> interest
> is mainly in remote HITMs as they cause the longest latencies.

All of that is true of the traditional SMP system too. Just use lower
level caches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to