> Indeed, good catch. Do we need the same treatment for > __set_page_dirty_buffers() that can be called by way of > clear_page_dirty_for_io()?
Indeed. I posted a patch fixed __set_page_dirty() too. plz see Subject: [PATCH] __set_page_dirty uses spin_lock_irqsave instead of spin_lock_irq -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
