There is also a typo in the driver version in the 2.6.11-rc2-mm2 tree that
is not fixed by the previous patch. Please apply this upated version to
fix the previously acknowledged problems and this typo causing a build
error.
Thanks,
Kylie
On Fri, 28 Jan 2005, Kylene Hall wrote:
> This patch puts in the missing up call on the tpm_mutex on an
> error condition in the tpm_transmit function. Bug reported by Stefan
> Berger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. This patch also implements a new status
> function to handle future chip configurations which may generate status
> differntly.
>
> Thanks,
> Kylie
>
Signed-off-by: Kylene Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
diff -uprN linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c
linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c 2005-01-18 16:42:17.000000000
-0600
+++ linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_atmel.c 2005-01-21
13:11:11.000000000 -0600
@@ -112,6 +112,11 @@ static void tpm_atml_cancel(struct tpm_c
outb(ATML_STATUS_ABORT, chip->vendor->base + 1);
}
+static u8 tpm_atml_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+ return inb( chip->vendor->base + 1);
+}
+
static struct file_operations atmel_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.llseek = no_llseek,
@@ -125,6 +130,7 @@ static struct tpm_vendor_specific tpm_at
.recv = tpm_atml_recv,
.send = tpm_atml_send,
.cancel = tpm_atml_cancel,
+ .status = tpm_atml_status,
.req_complete_mask = ATML_STATUS_BUSY | ATML_STATUS_DATA_AVAIL,
.req_complete_val = ATML_STATUS_DATA_AVAIL,
.base = TPM_ATML_BASE,
diff -uprN linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c 2005-01-31 13:59:38.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.c 2005-01-28 16:28:45.000000000
-0600
@@ -152,6 +151,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_c
if ((len = chip->vendor->send(chip, (u8 *) buf, count)) < 0) {
dev_err(&chip->pci_dev->dev,
"tpm_transmit: tpm_send: error %d\n", len);
+ up(&chip->tpm_mutex);
return len;
}
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ static ssize_t tpm_transmit(struct tpm_c
up(&chip->timer_manipulation_mutex);
do {
- u8 status = inb(chip->vendor->base + 1);
+ u8 status = chip->vendor->status(chip);
if ((status & chip->vendor->req_complete_mask) ==
chip->vendor->req_complete_val) {
down(&chip->timer_manipulation_mutex);
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ static ssize_t show_pcrs(struct device *
int i, j, index, num_pcrs;
char *str = buf;
- struct tpm_chip *chp =
+ struct tpm_chip *chip =
pci_get_drvdata(container_of(dev, struct pci_dev, dev));
if (chip == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
diff -uprN linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h 2005-01-18 16:42:17.000000000 -0600
+++ linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm.h 2005-01-21 13:10:20.000000000
-0600
@@ -40,6 +40,7 @@ struct tpm_vendor_specific {
int (*recv) (struct tpm_chip *, u8 *, size_t);
int (*send) (struct tpm_chip *, u8 *, size_t);
void (*cancel) (struct tpm_chip *);
+ u8 (*status) (struct tpm_chip *);
struct miscdevice miscdev;
};
diff -uprN linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c
linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c
--- linux-2.6.10/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c 2005-01-18 16:42:17.000000000
-0600
+++ linux-2.6.10-tpm/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nsc.c 2005-01-21 13:12:27.000000000
-0600
@@ -219,6 +219,12 @@ static void tpm_nsc_cancel(struct tpm_ch
outb(NSC_COMMAND_CANCEL, chip->vendor->base + NSC_COMMAND);
}
+
+static u8 tpm_nsc_status(struct tpm_chip *chip)
+{
+ return inb(chip->vendor->base + NSC_STATUS);
+}
+
static struct file_operations nsc_ops = {
.owner = THIS_MODULE,
.llseek = no_llseek,
@@ -232,6 +238,7 @@ static struct tpm_vendor_specific tpm_ns
.recv = tpm_nsc_recv,
.send = tpm_nsc_send,
.cancel = tpm_nsc_cancel,
+ .status = tpm_nsc_status,
.req_complete_mask = NSC_STATUS_OBF,
.req_complete_val = NSC_STATUS_OBF,
.base = TPM_NSC_BASE,
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
