On Thu, 2014-01-30 at 09:55 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Dave Hansen <d...@sr71.net> wrote:

> > From: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> > 
> > There are 7 architecures with "config SECCOMP".  They all have
> > virtually the same help text except for those referencing the
> > /proc interface.  The /proc interface was removed in 2007.
> > 
> > There is *NOTHING* architecture-specific about SECCOMP except
> > that the syscalls have per-architecture definitions, like every
> > other syscall.  It is absurd to have the option in the
> > arch-specific menus.
> > 
> > Move it to the security menu, consolidate the 7 down to one, and
> > remove the embarassingly-ancient help text references and
> > dependencies on /proc.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.han...@linux.intel.com>
> > Cc: linux-security-mod...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: linux-a...@vger.kernel.org
> > Cc: Stephen Rothwell <s...@canb.auug.org.au>
> > Cc: Mimi Zohar <zo...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Cc: Russell King <li...@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > Cc: Michal Simek <mon...@monstr.eu>
> > Cc: Ralf Baechle <r...@linux-mips.org> 

For powerpc:

Acked-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Reply via email to