On Thu, 23 Jan 2014 15:56:54 +0100, Jiri Olsa wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 09:13:45AM +0900, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>> There're some duplicate code when adding hist entries. They are
>> different in that some have branch info or mem info but generally do
>> same thing. So introduce new struct hist_entry_iter and add callbacks
>> to customize each case in general way.
>>
>
> SNIP
>
>>
>> - if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH) {
>> - ret = report__add_branch_hist_entry(tool, &al, sample, evsel);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - pr_debug("problem adding lbr entry, skipping event\n");
>> - } else if (rep->mem_mode == 1) {
>> - ret = report__add_mem_hist_entry(tool, &al, sample, evsel,
>> event);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - pr_debug("problem adding mem entry, skipping event\n");
>> - } else {
>> - if (al.map != NULL)
>> - al.map->dso->hit = 1;
>> -
>> - ret = report__add_hist_entry(tool, evsel, &al, sample);
>> - if (ret < 0)
>> - pr_debug("problem incrementing symbol period, skipping
>> event\n");
>> - }
>> + if (sort__mode == SORT_MODE__BRANCH)
>> + iter.ops = &hist_iter_branch;
>> + else if (rep->mem_mode == 1)
>
> nit.. mem_mode is bool
Ah, right! As you can see the old code already did it. ;-p
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
