-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Sat, Jan 29, 2005 at 12:49:05PM -0500, John Richard Moser wrote: > >>>The ideas in IBM's ProPolice changes are good and worth >>>implementing, but the current implementation is bad. >>> >> >>Lies. I've read the paper on the current implementation, it's >>definitely good. It only operates on C/C++ code though, but that's the >>scope of it. > > > Yeah, I guess your extensive compiler internals experience and knowledge > of gcc internals weights a lot more than the opinion of the gcc team.. > I read "implementation" as "the way it's implemented," not as "the quality of the code." Did I miss the target? *Aims in the other direction then?* > - -- All content of all messages exchanged herein are left in the Public Domain, unless otherwise explicitly stated. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFB+9GthDd4aOud5P8RAm/FAJwNvbrxPP8fcJmMM//vcYL10nMXTACggi57 jOKfS4FU1sdPL7AjKRgMmBg= =igR0 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
